When I
think LA I have the typical lights thought but I also was under the impression
that the street corners had a homeless person or two every block. Could the
lack of the homeless and drug addicts on the street be from the business that
are trying to keep their image so they push away the unclean? Do they separate themselves?
I guess if I had to stay in the city to survive, I’d like a quiet place to lay
my head. The sewers are slightly more appealing than having the lights in my
face consistently.
The description
of Steve’s living quarters made it seem like an actually home. I define ‘home’
by where you feel comfortable, where you personalize to have things you need
and enjoy. This man lives in the SEWER but he has tried to get “all the
supplies and stuff” since he has to live down there. He sounds to have just
about everything he needs- a queen sized bed, a clothes rack, walls, a mirror,
soap, shampoo, even a makeshift shower. The way he speaks is very different from
the other male he is sitting with at the time. He is well spoken; he sounds to
be educated. I was wondering how such a man ended down there. He knows how to get
money and he knows image is important. Then the drug addiction came out.
Adam was
also told by the ‘tour guide’ of some stuffed animals and blankets he found in
the sewer that lead to the assumption of children in the tunnels. Who would
keep their children in such a place?! A drug addict. This exemplifies the drug problem
in this city and makes me wonder what the city has to offer these people and
their dependents. I have a friend whose parent worked at LAPD and claimed that
there was so much going on in the city that the police have to make tough
choices- like to pass a burning car to respond to something more urgent. So
does the same happen with the low lives of the city? Could there be so much
money flowing around the city that they pass up the needy to make a quick buck?
<3 ShainaRene'
No comments:
Post a Comment